加载中...
Information Interaction, Investment Decisions and Stock Prices: Analysis Based on Institutional Investor Information Networks
机构投资者之间经常分享信息和相互学习,这种信息互动促进了私人信息在投资者之间的传播,并直接影响其决策和资产定价。基于社会网络理论,本文实证分析了基金之间的信息互动如何影响其决策和股票定价。首先,本文采用Pareek(2009)的方法建立基金信息网络:如果两只基金同时重仓持有相同的股票,则认为它们之间存在“连接”。其次,我们考察基金持仓决策与其信息网络成员持仓决策之间的关系,并进一步考虑不同决策情景和市场状态下信息互动效应是否显著且存在差异。然后,我们将信息互动效应划分为同城效应和异地效应,并检验两者是否存在显著差异。最后,我们检验信息互动效应在基金经理性别、从业年限和信息网络规模方面是否存在差异。此外,我们基于基金信息网络构建股票信息网络,研究信息互动如何影响股票定价。样本包括2005年第一季度至2018年第四季度沪深交易所所有A股上市公司以及股票型和混合型开放式基金。结果表明,信息互动对基金持仓决策具有显著影响,且在不同决策情景和市场状态下影响存在显著差异。基金经理的性别和从业年限以及信息网络的规模会影响信息互动的效应。在北京、广州和深圳,异地效应显著大于同城效应,而上海则相反。此外,信息共享降低了股票价格的长期特质波动率,股票市场的定价效率在其中发挥中介作用。
Abstract
Institutional investors often share information with and learn from others in the market. This information interaction promotes the dissemination of private information among investors and can directly affect their decision-making and asset pricing. Based on social network theory, this paper empirically analyzes how the information interaction between funds influences their decision-making and stock pricing. First, this paper uses Pareek's (2009) method to establish the fund information networks: if two funds are heavy holders of the same shares, they are deemed to be 'connected.' Second, we examine the relationship between the position decision-making of funds and that of the members of their information networks, and further consider whether the effects of the information interaction under different decision-making scenarios and market situations are significant and different. We then divide the effects into same-city and different-city effects and test whether there are significant differences. Finally, we test whether the effects vary in terms of gender, length of service of fund managers, and size of the information networks. In addition, we build a stock information network based on the fund information network to study how the information interaction affects stock pricing. Our sample comprises all A-share listed companies on the Shanghai and Shenzhen Stock Exchanges from the first quarter of 2005 to the fourth quarter of 2018 and equity and mixed open-ended funds. The results show that information interaction has a significant impact on funds' position decision-making, and the impact is significantly different under different decision-making scenarios and market situations. Fund managers' gender and length of service and the size of the information networks influence the effect of the information interaction. In Beijing, Guangzhou, and Shenzhen, the effects of other cities are significantly greater than those of the same city, while the case is the opposite in Shanghai. Moreover, information sharing reduces the long-term idiosyncratic volatility of stock prices, and the pricing efficiency of the stock market plays a mediating role.
信息互动显著影响基金持仓决策
以基金与信息网络成员持仓变化的相关系数度量信息互动(ΔH_N),OLS面板回归显示ΔH_N系数为0.283,在1%水平显著,说明基金持仓调整显著受信息网络成员影响。
信息互动效应在不同决策情景下存在差异
买入决策中信息互动效应(ΔH_N系数约0.405-0.533)大于卖出决策,且在不同市场状态下存在显著差异,表明信息互动对建仓行为的影响更为突出。
信息互动效应因基金经理特征和网络规模而异
性别、从业年限和网络规模交互项显著:女性基金经理、从业年限较短以及网络规模较大的基金,信息互动效应更强,说明主观和客观因素共同调节信息传播效果。
北京、广州、深圳异地效应大于同城,上海相反
分城市回归显示,北京、广州和深圳的异地信息互动系数显著大于同城,而上海同城效应更显著,可能源于上海本地信息网络更为密集和高效。
信息共享降低股价特质波动率,定价效率起中介作用
股票信息网络中心度(cen_d)对长期特质波动率(lnσ)的回归系数为-0.003,且在1%水平显著;中介效应检验表明市场定价效率(eff)是信息共享影响股价波动的重要渠道。
核心解释变量
信息互动程度,以基金与信息网络成员持仓变化的相关系数(ΔH_N、ΔH_R)度量
被解释变量
基金持仓变化(Δh)和股票长期特质波动率(lnσ)
样本与数据
2005年第一季度至2018年第四季度沪深交易所A股上市公司及股票型、混合型开放式基金,基金持仓数据来自Wind数据库,财务和交易数据来自CSMAR数据库
识别方法 / 模型设定
采用OLS面板回归,以基金与信息网络成员持仓变化的相关系数为核心解释变量,控制基金和股票特征,并利用网络结构特征和中介效应模型识别信息互动影响股价的机制
内生性及稳健性检验
通过分组回归(按决策情景、市场状态、城市、基金经理特征)、替换核心变量(如使用不同网络结构指标)、以及中介效应检验(Sobel检验)进行稳健性验证
更多相关数据正在补充