加载中...
Drivers of China's Industrial Chain "Going Global": A Dual Perspective on Input Downstreamness and Output Upstreamness
在全球产业链供应链加速重构态势下,中国出口导向战略的开放条件已发生重大变化,亟须通过主动海外投资布局来培育新形势下参与国际合作竞争的新优势。区别于现有研究大多聚焦发达国家“链主”企业如何带动产业链“走出去”,本文立足发展中国家层面,对企业从嵌入GVC走向OFDI进而推动产业链“走出去”的机制进行理论阐释。基于产出供应链和投入需求链双重视角,构建企业投入下游度(衡量与生产终端距离)和产出上游度(衡量与消费终端距离)指标来测度企业GVC位置,并结合中国制造企业数据进行验证。结果表明,企业在参与GVC过程中向生产终端靠近能够提升其技术能力,这会驱动企业“走出去”;而与GVC消费终端距离拉大会削弱企业市场势力,进而抑制其“走出去”。进一步分析发现,下游企业“走出去”能带动上游供应商中间品出口或跟随对外投资,从而推动产业链“走出去”。本文为中国产业链如何“走出去”以培育新竞争优势提供了有益启示。
Abstract
Amid rapid global industrial and supply chain restructuring, China's export-oriented strategy confronts fundamentally altered conditions, requiring proactive overseas investment to cultivate new competitive advantages. Recent scholarship increasingly emphasizes analyzing global value chain (GVC) participation and outward foreign direct investment (OFDI) within a unified framework. However, existing research mainly focuses on lead firms in developed economies, overlooking how firms in developing countries leverage GVC participation to build competitive advantages and extend industrial chains abroad. Unlike the integrated global networks of multinationals in developed countries, Chinese firms' overseas investments remain fragmented with limited supply chain support. Meanwhile, declining service trade costs, which particularly benefit service-advanced economies, intensify the urgency for developing countries to deploy industrial chains overseas. This study investigates how firms in developing countries evolve from GVC embeddedness to OFDI, thereby driving industrial chain "going global". Theoretically, this study explains how firms establish global production linkages through intermediate goods trade, leveraging technical capabilities near production endpoints and market power near consumption endpoints to facilitate overseas investment. Using Chinese microdata, this study constructs firm-level input downstreamness and output upstreamness and finds that proximity to production endpoints enhances technical capabilities and promotes OFDI, while distance from consumption endpoints weakens market power and inhibits OFDI. Industrial chain linkage analysis reveals that downstream firms' overseas investment triggers upstream suppliers to either export intermediates or invest abroad, thus driving industrial chain "going global". Our findings indicate that this transition from GVC participation to global investment represents both an inevitable trend driven by deepening international specialization and industrial upgrading, and a strategic imperative for Chinese firms amid profoundly changed export conditions. Policy implications are as follows. First, we can reduce OFDI costs to facilitate overseas industrial chain deployment; Second, we can encourage firms to extend from processing toward production endpoints to build technical capabilities; Third, we can strengthen domestic demand to enable firms to approach consumption endpoints and enhance market power; Fourth, we can cultivate regional cluster lead firms and reinforce linkages between outward-investing firms and domestic supply chains. By examining how firms in developing countries evolve from passive GVC participants to proactive drivers of industrial chain "going global", this study addresses existing literature's overemphasis on lead firms in developed countries and expands the analytical framework for overseas industrial chain deployment from a developing country's perspective. These findings provide microeconomic foundations and policy guidance for China to build new competitive advantages and enhance supply chain resilience and security through strategic "going global" initiatives.
投入下游度与OFDI显著正相关
基于2005—2013年中国工业企业数据的Logit回归显示,投入下游度每上升1个单位,企业开展OFDI的几率增加23.15%(几率比1.2315,显著性1%水平)。表明企业在GVC中越靠近生产终端,越倾向于进行对外直接投资,该结论在加入年份、省份和行业固定效应后保持稳健。
产出上游度与OFDI显著负相关
产出上游度每上升1个单位,企业开展OFDI的几率比降低21.68%(几率比0.7832,显著性1%水平)。表明企业越靠近消费终端,即产出上游度越低,越倾向于开展OFDI,验证了市场势力渠道的作用。
技术能力是靠近生产终端驱动OFDI的中介
以主成分分析法构建的技术能力合成指标和专利申请数衡量技术能力,中介效应ZMediation统计量分别为18.37和16.68(1%水平显著)。投入下游度增加通过提升企业技术能力进而促进OFDI,验证了假说1。
市场势力是靠近消费终端驱动OFDI的中介
以出口加成率和广告投入强度衡量市场势力,其中介效应ZMediation统计量的绝对值分别为12.52和7.11(1%水平显著)。产出上游度降低通过提升企业市场势力进而促进OFDI,验证了假说2。
下游企业OFDI带动上游供应商走出去
基于CSMAR前五大供应商数据构建供应链关系数据集,回归结果显示下游企业OFDI行为显著促进上游供应商中间品出口规模扩张(系数2.6572,1%水平显著),并显著提升供应商OFDI意愿(系数0.7529,5%水平显著)和对外投资规模(系数1.5340,10%水平显著),证实产业链关联带动效应。
核心解释变量
企业投入下游度(PosDown),衡量企业与生产终端距离,基于WIOD和ADB-MRIO投入产出表加权计算;企业产出上游度(PosUp),衡量企业与消费终端距离
被解释变量
企业OFDI决策(二元变量),样本期内企业首次进行OFDI取1,始终未进行OFDI取0
样本与数据
2005—2013年中国工业企业数据库与商务部境外投资企业名录匹配样本,共172271个观测值(投入下游度回归)和219680个观测值(产出上游度回归);稳健性检验使用2011—2021年制造业上市公司数据;进一步分析使用CSMAR前五大供应商供应链关系数据
识别方法 / 模型设定
采用二元Logit模型,逐步加入年份、省份和行业固定效应;使用几率比(Odds Ratio)解释经济含义;通过中介效应检验(Iacobucci,2012)验证技术能力和市场势力渠道;工具变量法进行内生性检验,以同城市其他企业GVC位置均值及日韩投入产出指标作为工具变量
内生性及稳健性检验
进行多维稳健性检验:①替换Probit模型和线性概率模型;②稀有事件偏差修正及补对数—对数模型;③剔除避税天堂和中国港澳台地区样本;④使用2011—2021年上市公司样本;⑤以企业主导产品GVC位置衡量并区分贸易与非贸易企业;⑥剔除子公司与母公司行业不一致或非水平型OFDI样本;⑦采用零膨胀负二项回归和OLS分析OFDI项目数和金额;⑧工具变量法缓解内生性
更多相关数据正在补充