加载中...
Statistical Measurement of Enterprise Digital Transformation: The Perspective of Digital Talent Demand
本文研究中国企业数字化转型程度,从劳动投入视角出发,聚焦企业对数字技术人才的需求。针对现有研究主要依赖上市公司数据和生产端指标可能导致转型水平被高估的问题,本文基于2014—2021年中国3339187家企业(含中小微企业)的网络招聘数据,提出劳动导向的测度策略。采用词典法进行文本挖掘,并结合机器学习与大语言模型进行稳健性检验,从人工智能、大数据、云计算、区块链和数字技术应用五个维度构建企业数字化转型综合指数。方法依据数字经济核算理论,论证了数字技术人才需求反映企业数字化转型程度的科学性。实证结果显示,截至2021年,中国企业数字化转型率仅为43.2%,显著低于基于上市公司测算的80%以上,凸显中小微企业数字鸿沟。分区域和行业分析显示,东部和技术密集型行业转型率较高,中部、西部、东北地区和传统服务业相对滞后。国际比较表明,中国企业尤其是中小微企业的数字化水平仍低于发达经济体。进一步,本文利用双重差分法评估2016年国家大数据综合试验区政策效应,发现该政策显著促进企业数字化转型,但主要体现在数字技术应用层面,对底层技术研发(人工智能、区块链等)的推动作用有限。机制分析显示,数字补贴、基础设施投资和区域数字生态是政策发挥效应的关键渠道。本文贡献包括:提出基于人力资本需求的新测度方法,克服年报文本分析中的两类偏误;拓展研究样本至中小微企业,增强代表性;首次使用劳动需求指标评估国家数字经济政策效果。最后提出建立全国数字化转型监测数据库、针对中小微企业设计差异化扶持方案、缩小区域数字鸿沟、鼓励底层数字技术研发以及加强产学研合作培养数字人才等政策建议。
Abstract
This paper investigates the degree of digital transformation in Chinese enterprises from the perspective of labor input, focusing on firms' demand for digital talent. The study responds to a growing debate in the literature regarding how far Chinese enterprises, particularly small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs), have progressed in their digital transformation. Existing research predominantly relies on data from listed firms and emphasizes production-side indicators, which may overstate transformation levels and misrepresent the broader corporate landscape. To address these limitations, this paper proposes a novel labor-oriented measurement strategy incorporating job posting data from 3339187 firms in China from 2014 to 2021, obtained from a leading online recruitment platform. By applying a dictionary-based text mining approach, supplemented with machine learning and large language models for robustness checks, the study constructs a multidimensional index of firm-level digital transformation across five key domains: artificial intelligence, big data, cloud computing, blockchain, and applied digital technologies. The methodology is grounded in the literature on digital economy accounting, particularly the dual-framework approach to measuring data assets through production and labor input. The paper argues that demand for digital talent reflects not only a firm's technological capability but also its actual deployment of digital infrastructure and transformation readiness. Compared with methods based on financial reports or policy exposure, the recruitment-based approach is more timely, granular, and inclusive of firms that are unlisted, newly established, or in emerging sectors. Empirical results reveal that as of 2021, only 43.2% of Chinese enterprises had engaged in digital transformation, significantly lower than estimates based on listed companies (over 80%). This highlights the persistent digital divide, especially in SMEs, and the need to re-evaluate assessments of China's digital economy progress. Further disaggregation shows notable regional and sectoral heterogeneity, with higher transformation rates in the eastern region and technology-intensive sectors, while the central, western, and northeastern regions, as well as traditional service industries, lag behind. In terms of international perspective, China's digitalization rate, particularly among SMEs, remains below that of advanced economies, where foundational technology development is more mature and institutional support for SME digitalization is more robust. The limited digital upgrading in Chinese SMEs is attributed not only to financing and talent constraints but also to low perceived returns, fragmented strategies, and weak inter-firm knowledge spillovers. The paper situates its findings within broader concerns about inclusive technological growth and structural transformation in developing economies. The study also evaluates the policy effectiveness of China's National Big Data Pilot Zones launched in 2016. Leveraging a difference-in-differences framework and a rich panel dataset, the paper identifies a significant positive causal effect of the policy on enterprise-level digital transformation. However, the impact is mainly reflected in enhancing applied digital technologies rather than advancing underlying technologies such as AI or blockchain. This asymmetry suggests that while policies may encourage digital adoption, they have limited influence on long-term innovation, particularly in resource-constrained SMEs. Mechanism analysis reveals that digital subsidies, infrastructure investment, and local digital ecosystems are critical channels through which the policy exerts effects. This research makes three major contributions. First, it introduces a new measurement approach rooted in firms' human capital demand, which overcomes 'false positive' and 'false negative' biases inherent in textual analysis of corporate reports. Second, it expands the empirical base of digital transformation research beyond listed firms by incorporating a comprehensive sample of SMEs, which account for the majority of employment and output in China. Third, it offers the first firm-level evaluation of national digital economy policy using a labor demand-based metric, contributing to the policy assessment literature. The paper concludes with several actionable policy recommendations. These include establishing a national database to monitor digital transformation progress, designing differentiated support schemes for SMEs, narrowing regional digital gaps through targeted infrastructure investment, encouraging foundational digital technology R&D to drive long-term competitiveness, and fostering university-industry collaboration to strengthen digital talent training and improve SMEs' ability to attract and retain skilled professionals.
截至2021年中国企业数字化转型率仅43.2%
基于2014-2021年3339187家企业网络招聘数据测算,采用文本分析识别数字技术人才需求,结果显示2021年数字化转型率为43.2%,显著低于基于上市公司样本的80%以上估计,表明中小微企业数字化转型程度较低。
国家大数据综合试验区政策显著促进企业数字化转型
使用双重差分模型,以2016年设立的国家大数据综合试验区为准自然实验,结果显示政策使实验组企业数字化转型程度提升幅度相当于样本均值水平的35.83%,在事前趋势检验、安慰剂检验和稳健性检验后仍成立。
大数据试验区主要促进数字技术应用而非底层技术研发
分维度检验显示,政策对数字技术应用水平的促进效应显著且经济显著性较高,对人工智能、云计算、区块链技术的影响不显著,对大数据技术有一定促进作用,这可能是中小微企业数字化转型程度较低的重要原因。
分维度看云计算运用率最高,区块链运用率最低
2021年云计算运用率为19.47%,人工智能为15.05%,大数据技术为11.30%,区块链技术仅为0.93%,数字技术应用维持28%左右,反映企业数字化主要依赖应用而非自主研发。
区域和产业数字化转型程度存在显著差异
数字化转型率按东部、中部、西部和东北地区递减,东部不到50%,中部和西部低于40%,东北接近35%。第二产业数字化水平较高(43.36%),第三产业其次(43.22%),第一产业最低(41.49%)。信息传输和科学研究行业领先,住宿餐饮、建筑、交运仓储邮政较低。
核心解释变量
所在城市当年是否为大数据综合试验区(双重差分项:政策虚拟变量与时间虚拟变量交乘)
被解释变量
企业数字化转型程度(基于招聘文本识别的数字化转型累积指数,及人工智能、大数据、云计算、区块链、数字技术应用五个分维度指数)
样本与数据
2014-2021年中国3339187家企业网络招聘数据,与工商注册数据匹配,剔除港澳台和海外招聘,最终观测值4105489个;城市层面数据来自《中国城市统计年鉴》
识别方法 / 模型设定
双重差分法(DID),以2016年国家大数据综合试验区设立为准自然实验,处理组为试验区城市企业,对照组为非试验区城市企业;控制企业和年份固定效应、行业×年份固定效应、企业及城市层面控制变量;标准误聚类到城市层面
内生性及稳健性检验
事前趋势检验(事件研究法)、安慰剂检验排除同期其他政策干扰、使用存续企业样本、考虑关联企业、使用大语言模型(ERNIE)重新测度、上市公司子样本对比,校准招聘文本测度
AI岗位线上招聘数据
AI招聘可支持的研究问题:本研究使用网络招聘数据测度企业数字化转型,AI岗位招聘数据可进一步分析企业数字化转型中AI人才的需求特征与演化趋势。
A股上市公司AI岗位线上招聘数据
AI岗位可支持的研究问题:可结合上市公司AI岗位招聘数据,比较分析上市公司与中小微企业在数字化转型中对数字技术人才需求的差异。
新媒体运营岗位线上招聘数据
新媒体运营可支持的研究问题:该数据集涵盖新媒体运营岗位招聘信息,可以反映企业在数字营销和社交媒体等数字化转型应用层面的人才需求。
中国零工经济线上招聘数据
零工经济可支持的研究问题:零工经济线上招聘数据可分析数字经济背景下企业灵活用工与数字人才需求的关系,辅助理解企业数字化转型过程中的劳动力结构调整。
中国财经文本语料数据
财经语料可支持的研究问题:该财经文本语料库可用于拓展词库、训练机器学习模型或进行政策文本大数据分析,常被用于测度政策不确定性等,可与招聘文本方法互补,也可用于检验大数据试验区政策效果的文本佐证。