加载中...
Is Government Responsiveness Priced in Capital Markets? Evidence from Chengtou Bond Credit Spreads
改善政府回应的努力需要很长时间才能显现成效,这种付出即时性与激励长期性之间的矛盾会削弱地方政府持续提升回应能力的积极性。本文基于"领导留言板"海量的公众留言,采用自然语言处理模型来构建政府回应的度量指标,研究资本市场是否能够为改善政府回应提供即时激励。结果发现,改善政府回应能够显著降低城投债的信用利差,这说明地方政府为改善回应所付出的努力能够被资本市场识别并转化为融资成本的下降。机制分析表明,政府回应通过提高地方政府的组织声誉以及形成清廉的制度环境来降低城投债的信用利差。进一步分析发现,在公众投诉政府机关、公众诉求较为复杂的留言样本以及非中央巡视期间、审计监督力度较弱的地区,改善政府回应对城投债信用利差扩大的抑制作用更加明显。本文研究表明资本市场能够为积极回应公众诉求的地方政府提供即时激励,这对于提升政府治理能力具有积极作用。
Abstract
General Secretary Xi Jinping has repeatedly emphasised the need to respond promptly and effectively to the demands and concerns of the public. However, achieving rapid and efficient handling of public appeals requires substantial human and material resources, while yielding limited short-term economic returns. This temporal misalignment between effort and incentives consequently weakens local governments' motivation to improve their responsiveness continuously. Providing effective immediate incentives is, therefore, key to enhancing government performance. This study examines, using extensive data from the Local Leadership Message Board (LLMB), whether the efforts local governments make to improve responsiveness are recognised by capital markets and translated into financing advantages. The findings reveal that improved government responsiveness significantly reduces the credit spreads of chengtou bonds. This indicates that proactive engagement with public appeals can yield tangible financing benefits. Analysis of the mechanism suggests that responsiveness lowers credit spreads by enhancing the organisational reputation of local governments and fostering a more transparent institutional environment. Further analysis shows that this negative relationship is more pronounced for messages containing complaints against government agencies, those involving complex public demands, during periods without central inspections, and in regions with weaker audit oversight. This paper contributes to the literature in three main aspects. First, whereas Western theories of government responsiveness are predominantly rooted in electoral competition, this study – grounded in Chinese administrative practice – takes local governments' quotidian responsiveness in governance as its analytical lens, thereby extending the theory of government responsiveness into the Chinese context. Second, unlike prior research reliant on static documentary sources, this study introduces dynamic behavioural information by focusing on whether local governments actively address public appeals, thus enriching the understanding of how chengtou bond credit spreads are determined. Third, existing studies have largely overlooked how the practice of government responsiveness feeds back to benefit the governments themselves. By demonstrating how such responsiveness generates immediate incentives through capital market channels, this study expands the literature on the impact and political economy of government accountability.
改善政府回应显著降低城投债信用利差
政府回应速度每上升一个标准差,城投债信用利差下降6.14个基点(相当于均值的2.50%),表明资本市场能识别并奖励地方政府的回应努力。
提高政府回应质量同样降低信用利差
政府回应质量每上升一个标准差,城投债信用利差下降5.27个基点(相当于均值的2.14%),进一步验证了政府回应与信用利差之间的负相关关系。
声誉机制是政府回应降低信用利差的重要渠道
政府回应速度和质量的提升显著改善了地方政府的组织声誉(reputation),声誉作为一种履约保障机制,增强投资者信心,从而降低城投债融资成本。
腐败治理机制是政府回应降低信用利差的重要渠道
政府回应速度和质量的提升显著降低了地区腐败程度(corrupt),清廉的制度环境减少了官员寻租和干预,提高城投公司经营效率,从而降低信用利差。
政府回应的影响在投诉政府机关及复杂诉求样本中更强
在公众投诉政府机关或诉求较为复杂的留言样本中,改善政府回应对城投债信用利差的抑制作用更为显著,说明资本市场能识别政府在解决难点问题上的努力。
政府回应在外部监督较弱时作用更显著
在非中央巡视期间和审计监督力度较弱的地区,政府回应对信用利差的抑制效应更强,表明政府回应作为一种内部治理机制在一定程度上可替代正式的外部监督。
核心解释变量
政府回应速度和政府回应质量:政府回应速度(rs)采用公众诉求在10个工作日内被回复的比例度量;政府回应质量(rq)基于BERT模型将政府回应分为知情告知(1)、建议说明(2)、开展调查(3)、实际解决(4)四类,取地区-季度平均值。
被解释变量
城投债信用利差(spread):城投债券的到期收益率与相同剩余期限国债到期收益率之差的季度平均值。
样本与数据
2011-2022年发行的城投债,覆盖310个地级行政单位和4个直辖市,共36,612只城投债,261,266个城投债-季度观测值。政府回应数据来自人民网领导留言板,城投债数据来自万得数据库。
识别方法 / 模型设定
采用工具变量(居民采取集体行动的倾向程度)和错时双重差分模型(基于省级政府颁布的网民意见回复政策文件)处理内生性问题。
内生性及稳健性检验
包括:1)更换政府回应速度和质量的度量方法;2)剔除解决难度较大的留言样本;3)剔除留言归属城市与IP位置不符的样本;4)添加主政官员个体固定效应。