加载中...
The Fostering Policy for "Little Giants" and Innovation Quality: Empirical Evidence from Invention Patents of Listed Enterprises
企业创新是高质量发展的关键。本文采用机器学习方法对我国403万项授权发明专利文本全文的技术细节进行文本分析,以此评价专利的原创性与影响力,并基于此构建更加科学的企业创新质量指标,以2007-2021年A股上市公司为例,使用多时点双重差分模型,考察了专精特新政策对企业创新质量的影响。研究结果表明:专精特新政策的实施能显著提升企业创新质量,且在控制了内生性和稳健性检验后依然成立。专精特新政策通过3种作用机制显著提升了企业创新质量,即缓解企业融资约束、鼓励企业探索未知技术领域,以及促使企业专业化发展。此外,异质性分析发现,在研发投入意愿较高、策略式创新行为较少的企业中,专精特新政策对创新质量的提升作用更明显。以上发现对进一步完善相关政策、推动技术创新、提升创新质量具有重要参考意义。
Abstract
In the context of fostering new growth drivers through scientific and technological innovation and steadily advancing high-quality development, enterprises are the main agents of such innovation, and their innovative activity is key to achieving this development. Numerous studies have confirmed the significant impact of market factors on enterprise-level innovation. However, there is no consensus in the literature regarding the influence of government policies on this innovation, and its quality has received scant attention. To address the above deficiencies, this paper employs machine learning methods to conduct a text analysis of the technical details in the full texts of 4.03 million granted invention patents in China, thereby evaluating their originality and influence. On this basis, a more scientific quality index for enterprise innovation is constructed. Taking A-share listed enterprises from 2007 to 2021 as an example, a staggered difference-in-differences (DID) model is used to systematically evaluate the actual impact of the "Little Giants" policy – which fosters specialised, refined, distinctive and innovative enterprises – on enterprise innovation quality. It also examines the internal pathways through which government innovation incentive policies affect innovation quality from the perspectives of specialisation development and adjustments in enterprise innovation strategies. Empirical analysis shows that, first, the implementation of the "Little Giants" policy significantly enhances enterprise innovation quality. This paper employs the Heckman two-stage method and propensity score matching (PSM) to control for potential endogeneity. It then conducts robustness checks by altering the measurement of the dependent and independent variables, selecting samples of small and medium-sized enterprises, controlling for the potential influence of other innovation policies, and changing the estimation model. After endogeneity concerns are addressed and robustness checks are performed, this positive effect remains valid. Second, the "Little Giants" policy significantly enhances enterprise innovation quality through three mechanisms: alleviating enterprise financing constraints, encouraging enterprises to explore unknown technological fields, and promoting their specialisation. Third, heterogeneity analysis reveals that the positive effect of the "Little Giants" policy on innovation quality is more pronounced in enterprises with higher research and development (R&D) intensity and fewer strategic innovation behaviours. Further analysis confirms that improvements in enterprise innovation quality lead to increased operating income and market value. These findings offer important implications for refining relevant policies, fostering technological innovation, and enhancing innovation quality.
专精特新政策显著提升企业创新质量
基准回归结果显示,专精特新政策对企业创新质量(突破式创新数量的对数)的回归系数为0.064,在5%水平上显著。经过PSM-DID、Heckman两阶段等一系列内生性与稳健性检验后,结论依然成立。
政策通过缓解融资约束提升创新质量
机制检验发现,专精特新政策显著降低了企业融资约束(SA指数),回归系数为-0.052,在1%水平上显著,表明政策缓解了企业融资约束,进而促进创新质量提升。
政策鼓励企业探索未知技术领域
机制检验显示,专精特新政策显著提高了企业在未知技术领域的专利申请数量(Breakthrough_Apply),回归系数为0.193,在10%水平上显著,表明政策促使企业进行突破式创新探索。
政策促使企业专业化发展
机制检验发现,专精特新政策显著提升了企业的专业化分工水平(VSI),回归系数为0.064,在1%水平上显著,表明政策引导企业在细分领域垂直深耕,进而提升创新质量。
对高研发投入、低策略式创新企业效果更明显
异质性分析发现,专精特新政策对创新质量的提升作用在研发投入强度较高的企业(系数0.072,10%水平显著)和策略式创新倾向较低的企业(系数0.104,5%水平显著)中更为明显,组间差异检验显著。
核心解释变量
核心解释变量:企业是否获评专精特新称号(Fund),包括省级专精特新中小企业或国家级专精特新"小巨人"企业的虚拟变量
被解释变量
被解释变量:企业创新质量(Quality_20%),定义为基于专利文本相似度测算的发明专利质量评分前20%的突破式创新数量加1取对数
样本与数据
样本为2007-2021年中国沪深A股上市公司,剔除金融行业和变量缺失样本,最终获得4453家上市公司共35,916个观测值。专利文本数据来自国家知识产权局1992-2022年授权的4,028,568项发明专利,专精特新认定情况来自国泰安数据库
识别方法 / 模型设定
采用多时点双重差分(DID)模型,以专精特新政策作为准自然实验。处理组为获评省级专精特新中小企业或国家级专精特新"小巨人"的企业,对照组为未受政策激励的企业。控制企业和年份固定效应,标准误聚类到省份层面。并使用PSM-DID和Heckman两阶段法缓解内生性问题
内生性及稳健性检验
稳健性检验包括:①替换被解释变量(调整突破式创新阈值为15%和25%、改变专利质量评分窗口、剔除失效专利、纳入非上市公司专利);②替换解释变量(区分国家级和省级认定);③排除同期其他创新政策影响(创新型城市试点、瞪羚/独角兽/雏鹰企业);④控制城市层面因素(FDI、人口、财政支出等);⑤更换泊松回归和负二项回归模型;⑥安慰剂检验(随机分配处理组500次)
中国专利文本数据
专利文本可支持的研究问题:如何利用描述文本中的技术领域分类与权利要求数量,区分政策效应在不同行业、企业规模及专利类型间的差异,以检验创新质量提升是源于实质性技术突破还是策略性专利布局。
更多相关数据正在补充