加载中...
Cross-border Data Flows Regulations and Corporate Supply Chain Transfer
在数据作为关键生产要素的时代,数据跨境流动被认为是推动全球经济增长的重要动力,但随之而来的安全问题也促使世界主要经济体对数据的跨境流动施加了一定限制。本文将视角聚焦于中国的数据跨境流动监管政策,分析了数据跨境流动监管规范化对企业供应链的影响。基于FactSet Reserve供应链数据的研究发现:数据跨境流动监管规范化一方面导致中国企业维系海外客户的成本上升,推动下游供应链向国内转移;另一方面加剧了国内市场竞争,依赖海外供应商的企业亦需调整运营策略,推动企业上游供应链向海外转移。异质性分析表明:当供应链企业所在国家对数据跨境流动的限制较小时,中国数据跨境流动监管规范化对企业供应链造成的冲击会被放大;相较于国有企业,非国有企业受到数据跨境流动监管规范化的影响更明显。最后,本文发现数据跨境流动监管规范化的影响会沿供应链传导,促进上下游企业创新,并进一步从政府和企业两个角度探讨了企业的供应链稳定性。本文的研究有助于政府制定更为完善和合理的数据跨境流动政策,并对一系列关于供应链产业链安全的政策文件做出了回应。
Abstract
In the era where data constitutes a critical factor of production, cross-border data flows are widely regarded as a significant driver of global economic growth. However, attendant security concerns have prompted major economies to introduce various regulatory constraints on such flows. China's regulatory policies on cross-border data flows are significantly different from those of other countries and regions, such as the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR). As China's regulatory framework for cross-border data flows becomes increasingly institutionalized and standardized, how will such policy developments impact corporate operations and strategic adaptations ? This study integrates the enterprise supply chain into the analytical framework and systematically examines how changes in regulatory policies influence adjustments within supply chains. Employing a difference-in-differences framework and leveraging the FactSet Revere database, the study finds that the evolving cross-border data flow policies have increased the costs for Chinese firms to maintain overseas customers, thereby encouraging a domestic reorientation of downstream supply chain segments. Simultaneously, these regulatory changes have intensified competition of domestic market, compelling firms reliant on foreign suppliers to adapt their operational strategies, which, in turn, has contributed to an outward shift in upstream supply chain activities. Heterogeneity analysis further reveals that the impact of China's cross-border data flow regulations on corporate supply chains is amplified when trading partner countries impose relatively fewer restrictions on data flows. Moreover, compared to state-owned enterprises, non-state-owned enterprises exhibit greater sensitivity to these regulatory changes. The paper also demonstrates that the effects of policy adjustments propagate along the supply chain, stimulating innovation among both upstream and downstream firms. Finally, the analysis suggests that enhancing innovation capabilities and improving firms’ positions within the supply chain can help mitigate the disruptions caused by regulatory changes. From a policy perspective, governments can support corporate adaptation through improved digital infrastructure and targeted innovation subsidies. Existing research has primarily focused on the effects of traditional trade instruments, such as tariffs, import and export controls, and trade agreements, on supply chain configurations. However, there remains limited attention to interaction with data governance regimes and global supply chains. While a growing body of work has begun to examine the implications of cross-border data flow policies, employing theoretical modeling and empirical analysis to investigate their transmission mechanisms and welfare effects, China’s regulatory approach differs markedly from prevailing international models. Based on the evolution of China's cross-border data flow policies, this paper explores how this policy affects corporate supply chains, providing new perspectives and empirical evidence for a further understanding of cross-border data flow policies. This paper offers several critical policy implications. First, it is essential to refine the regulation policies for cross-border data flows and implement facilitation measures. The outbound transfer of data involving national security, major public interests, and core critical data should be strictly controlled, so as to promote orderly cross-border data flows. Second, efforts should be made to promote the research and application of privacy-enhancing technologies. It is necessary to leverage special funds, tax incentives, and other policies to help enterprises achieve the dual goals of data value mining and security protection. Third, the alignment with international rules should be deepened. Proactive measures should be taken to participate in the global data governance system and promote the coordination of cross-border data flow rules under multilateral frameworks to achieve higher-standard opening up.
数据跨境流动监管规范化推动下游客户向国内转移
以2021年中国数据跨境流动监管规范化为政策冲击,使用双重差分模型,以数字贸易行业企业为处理组,其他企业为对照组。被解释变量为海外客户比例。回归结果显示,Treat×Post的系数显著为负,表明相较于非数字贸易企业,数字贸易企业的海外客户比例减少约4%,样本期内企业平均海外客户比例约为17%,下降幅度可观。
数据跨境流动监管规范化推动上游供应商向海外转移
在数据跨境流动监管规范化后,数字贸易行业企业的海外供应商比例显著上升。回归系数表明,相较于非数字贸易企业,数字贸易企业的海外供应商比例上涨约3%,样本期内企业平均海外供应商比例约为13%,上涨比例相当可观。
数据跨境流动监管规范化加剧国内市场竞争
机制检验发现,数据跨境流动监管规范化后,数字贸易企业的勒纳指数显著下降,表明企业定价能力被削弱,面临的市场竞争强度显著增强。企业为摆脱竞争,可能通过寻求海外供应商获取竞争优势,表现为上游供应链向海外转移。
数据跨境流动监管规范化的影响沿供应链传导,促进上下游企业创新
进一步研究发现,数据跨境流动监管规范化不仅影响数字贸易企业本身,还沿供应链传导至上下游企业。数字贸易企业上游供应商面临业务流失压力,下游客户则有机会接触更高质量的国内上游资源,两者均需通过增加创新投入以应对变化,从而促进了供应链上企业的创新产出。
核心解释变量
Treat×Post,其中Treat为处理组虚拟变量(企业位于数字贸易行业取1,否则为0),Post为政策虚拟变量(2021年后取1,否则为0)
被解释变量
海外供应商比例(海外供应商数量/全部供应商数量);海外客户比例(海外客户数量/全部客户数量)
样本与数据
2015-2023年中国上市企业,企业供应链数据来自FactSet Reserve数据库,企业财务数据来自CSMAR数据库。剔除ST企业、2021年后上市的企业以及观测值全部位于2021年后的样本企业,最终得到31789个研究样本。
识别方法 / 模型设定
双重差分模型(DID),以数字贸易行业企业作为实验组,其他企业作为对照组,2021年作为政策冲击时点。使用事件研究法进行事前趋势检验。使用基于OECD软件投资指标构建的工具变量进行两阶段最小二乘法(2SLS)缓解内生性问题。
内生性及稳健性检验
1. 事前趋势检验(事件研究法);2. 构造企业层面数据跨境流动强度指标进行连续DID回归;3. PSM-DID方法(最临近1:2匹配);4. 使用工具变量法(2SLS)缓解内生性;5. 采用分数Logit模型;6. 删除金融行业样本;7. 删除样本期内行业变化的样本;8. 控制中美贸易摩擦影响(加入变量War);9. 改变因变量为海外供应商与国内供应商数量;10. 在企业—年份—国家层次回归并加入企业—国家和国家—年份固定效应。
更多相关数据正在补充